Filtering: How It Works

Google has opened a new Chinese-language search engine at that filters out results from sites that are considered “sensitive” by the Chinese government. In addition to filtering search results are also filtered for the human right groups and and all of the free hosting community. This filtering is quite similar to the filtering conducted by domestic Chinese search engines.

The filtering takes place in two ways:

1. de-listed domains: specific websites are removed entirely from search results; it is as if the website never existed.
2. de-listed urls: specific urls are removed from search results if they contain a de-listed domain.

For example, the domain has been removed from Using Google’ “site:” modifier, a search for “” in returns no results and appears as if there is not such a website all. In addition to Google’s usual text that appears when searching for a non-existent website additional text appears informing the user that results have been removed to comply with local law.

However, using Google’s “inurl:” modifier, a search for “” does appear to return results although they are not listed and instead are replaced with text informing the user that results have been removed to comply with local law. Furthermore, a search for “ inurl:news” shows that although is indexed and searchable the specific domain is not listed in the search results.

Another illustrative example is a search in for “ inurl:dmirror” versus the same search in In 3 results are returned and all three are listed whereas returns 3 results but only lists 2 of them. The missing URL is “” which contains the text “” in the URL path.

The website is treated as a de-listed domain ( however, a search with the modifier “inurl:” ( does return results although none of the results are actual the requested website. But a search for “” (with a trailing slash) also returns results but does not list them for the user.

This fine grain control allows to keep websites such as “” in its index while eliminating There is similar fine grain control targeting Chinese language content. While there are results for “” there are no results for ““.

To be clear, this filtering only affects; users who choose to access Google’s Chinese language search engine at are not subjected to this filtering.

While this filtering can be easily circumvented most users will simply use, since users from China are redirected there by default.

Here are just some of the sites that have been de-listed by


  1. […] (Crossposted on ICE) […]

  2. […] My friend Nart Villeneuve adds some science to the media furour over censorship on   […]

  3. […] The anti-censorship community has been hard at work today trying to figure out just how Google’s new Chinese search engine prevents access to controversial content. Nart Villeneuve, pretty much the smartest guy out there working on Internet censorship, offered a post yesterday with some early insights into how sites are being blocked. […]

  4. Google China Search Comparison…

    Kudos to the OpenNet Initiative for putting together a fantastic tool that lets you compare search results from and the now famously censored Check out their sample searches in English and Chinese, and analysis from geniuses Etha…

  5. I am curious if anyone has googled “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” on If so, Is Article 19, which says that free aceess to information is a human right, censored? I would appreciate hearing.
    Sam McFarland

Post a comment.